8
19.
635
Junction Railway Company reported)
b 2. B. 483.
in 19
Law
Journal 2.
The Company
the 2101
¢ £
yover
The
Janmary
There
1897
prevecular notice that they
required to purchase a part of his
house
have and premises, and no furition
stepo
Aver L wen
taken by ection partij lill
the 30 of May 1849, when the
prosecutor
Jove
notice to the Company of the amount of his dain for the
part of his houve and premises which
"The Company required,
and
for damage
"which the severance would cause, and)
amennt
"demanded) that the "compensation to which h
"should be determined by
a
of the
was
entitled
jury.
The
"Campany neglected and refused to
" issue their war
11
"a jury?"
warrant for
moning
The Cavit after time tätten to
carsider
gave judgment in favor of chor
Crawn and awarded.
dan
This
to the Excheque
judgement
Mao
11/as
C
peremptory
afterwards flosswords lations Chamber and
affirmed
20 L. I. 2. B. 304.
As
shu
exported in
Lord Wessly date in delivering the
judgment of the Count of lever
"We
says.
.
are all (the Court consisted of seven "Judges) of opinion that the judgment "given by Lord Chief Justice Campbell "is correct. The notice to treat is " inchoate punchase, and after that has
IX.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.